IGRA also emphasizes the dire economic need of Tribes, citing gaming as one of the few revenue-producing opportunities that has generated adequate revenues to sustain Tribal governments.

IGRA recognizes the right of Tribes to conduct gaming on Tribal land in states where similar gaming is permitted outside the Reservation for other purposes. In 1988, IGRA became law after Tribes and states reached a compromise which gave states unprecedented regulatory participation through the negotiation of Tribal-state gaming compacts. State governments reacted with alarm and Congress began consideration of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA). Supreme Court ruled in 1987 that states had no authority to prosecute gaming conducted on Indian land (California v. Ensure that the Tribe is the primary beneficiary of its gaming activities.

Maintain the integrity of Indian gaming.

Promote Tribal economic development self-sufficiency and strong Tribal governments.

The confluence of the Tribe’s gaming law, the Federal Government’s gaming law and the Tribe-State compact is to: The Commission’s primary mission is to work within the framework created by the Tribe’s Gaming Regulatory Act of 2010, the Federal Government’s Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), and the Compact between the Tribe and the State of Michigan. In exercising its regulatory authority the Commission does not interfere with the managerial discretion of gaming operations. The Commission ensures that all gaming within the Tribe’s jurisdiction is conducted in compliance with Tribal and Federal law and the agreement between the Tribe and the State of Michigan. The Gaming Commission’s role is defined by the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi’s Gaming Regulatory Act of 2010 which made gaming lawful within the Tribe’s jurisdiction and delegated the primary regulatory role to the Commission.

Firekeepers casino management